Hardeep Singh v. Punjab Agro Food Corp. etc.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 2296 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: 25.5.2009
Hardeep Singh
... Petitioner
v.
Punjab Agro Food Grains Corporation, Sangrur and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. R.S. Modi, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Geeta Gulati, Advocate for respondent No. 1.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main relief claimed in the revision petition has been rendered infructuous as respondent No. 2 has already milled the paddy for the current season. However, the learned court below in the impugned order, while observing that the District Food and Supplies Controller, Patiala as well as Sangrur have violated the policy of the State Government, directed the Secretary, Department of Food and Supplies, Punjab to look into the matter and take action against the erring officials. He submits that considering the aforesaid facts, he may be permitted to withdraw the present revision petition to enable him to pursue the matter with the Secretary, Department of Food and Supplies, Punjab so that the policy framed by the Government is not violated in future.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
25.5.2009 mk
Hardeep Singh
Punjab Agro Food Grains Corporation
another
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court