Single-judge order where the Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal dismissed the pending Civil Revision No. 1989 of 2009 by relying on detailed reasons furnished in a separate order (C.R. No. 1988 of 2009) passed on the same date.
God forbid Civil Revision No. 1989 of 2009 is dismissed on the basis of the reasoning contained in C.R. No. 1988 of 2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of decision: 16.4.2009
Civil Revision No. 1989 of 2009 (O&M)
Navin Raheja
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Babu Ram and others
.. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Shailendra Jain, Advocate for the petitioner.
Rajesh Bindal J.
For the detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of today, passed in C.R. No. 1988 of 2009 –Navin Raheja v. Shiv Darshan Kakkar and others, the present petition is dismissed.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
16.4.2009 mk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present civil revision petition should be decided independently or referred to the earlier order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Navin Raheja v. Shiv Darshan Kakkar and othersRelied on¶12
C.R. No. 1988 of 2009 – Navin Raheja v. Shiv Darshan Kakkar and others
Navin Raheja
Babu Ram and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
