The court refers to a detailed order of the same date passed in a related RFA (No. 1699 of 1995) regarding Smt. Shanti Devi versus the State of Haryana, indicating that reasons are recorded there rather than in this succinct order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
RFA No. 1906 of 1995 (O&M)
Indian Oil Corporation Limited ..... Appellant vs Mrs. Shanti Devi and others ..... Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present: None for the appellant.
Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.
Rajesh Bindal J.
For orders see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in RFA No. 1699 of 1995 Smt. Shanti Devi vs State of Haryana and another.
15.4.2009 ( Rajesh Bindal) vs. Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the matter is disposed of in this order given the cross-reference to a detailed order passed on an earlier application
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
RFA No. 1699 of 1995, Smt. Shanti Devi vs State of Haryana and anotherReferred¶8
Indian Oil Corporation Limited
Mrs. Shanti Devi and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
