Petitioners withdrew the civil revision petition to enable raising issues in a potential appeal. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to raise issues in appeal if passed.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as per law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 1426 of 2009 (O&M) Date of decision: March 17, 2009
Sunehra and others
.. Petitioners
v.
Hari Ram and others
.. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition to enable him to raise the issue, if required, in the appeal against the judgment and decree of the trial court, if passed against the petitioners.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as per law.
(Rajesh Bindal) Judge
17.3.2009 mk
Sunehra and others
Hari Ram and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
