HUDA v. Sumitra Devi & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A.No.361 of 2006(O&M)
Haryana Urban Development Authority
....Appellant
Versus
Sumitra Devi and others
....Respondents.
CORAM : Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rajesh Bindal.
Present:Mr.Jitender Dhanda, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr.H.S.Hooda, Advocate General, Haryana, with Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.
RAJESH BINDAL J
For orders see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order of even date passed in R.F.A.No.788 of 2006 titled Kirpal Singh versus Government of Haryana and others.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Haryana Urban Development Authority
- respondent
Sumitra Devi and others
Coram
Rajesh Bindal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/361/2006
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court