After hearing the parties, learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Phagwara vide order dated August 23, 2002 disposed of the application by directing the parties to maintain status quo with regard to possession and further alienation and construction over the suit property during the pendency of the suit. Aggrieved of the same, Sukhchain Chadha-defendant filed an appeal and a separate appeal was filed by the petitioners under Order XLIII Rule 1 C.P.C. Both the appeals were accepted by Additional District Judge-II, Kapurthala vide order dated August 06, 2003. Resultantly, the application filed by respondent No.1 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 C.P.C. was dismissed, being without any merit. The plaintiff then filed two revision petitions which came to be decided by the High Court on September 09, 2004 by directing that the parties would remain in possession of their respective areas till the decision of the suit and in case any of the parties raised construction over the areas in their possession, the same would be subject to the decision of the suit. The parties were also restrained from alienating the suit property.
