Court allowed the present writ petition and connected miscellaneous applications in identical terms as a previous judgment (Balwant Singh v. Union of India) regarding the same controversy, without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Misc. No. 9045-46 of 2008 with Civil Writ Petition No. 8219 of 2007 Date of decision: 7th May, 2008
Punjab State Electricity Board
… Petitioner
Versus
Controlling Authority-cum-Assistant Labour Commissioner and others
… Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
Present: Mr. S.C.Pathela, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sonia G. Singh, Advocate for respondent No.3.
ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA, J. (ORAL)
CM No. 9045-46 of 2008
CMs allowed.
CWP No. 8219 of 2007
The controversy involved in this writ petition was also subject matter of decision in CWP No. 5126 of 2004 titled Balwant Singh v. Union of India , which has been allowed vide judgment dated 27th February, 2008.
Counsel for the respondent does not dispute the aforementioned factual position.
In view of the above, present writ petition is allowed in the same terms as in CWP No. 5126 of 2004.
[ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA] JUDGE
[KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA] JUDGE
May 07, 2008 rps
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Balwant Singh v. Union of IndiaRelied on¶14
CWP No. 5126 of 2004 titled Balwant Singh v. Union of India
Punjab State Electricity Board
Controlling Authority-cum-Assistant Labour Commissioner and others
Ashutosh Mohanta
Kanwalsingh Ahluwalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
