In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner argued that the petition had become infructuous. The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous based on the petitioner's counsel's statement.
The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 7822 of 2007 Date of decision: September 5, 2008
--Rupinder Kaur Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
---Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashutosh Mohunta Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta
Present: Mr. SK Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. BS Chahal, AAG, Punjab.
Ashutosh Mohunta, J.
Counsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement of counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
[Ashutosh Mohunta] Judge
[Rajan Gupta] Judge
September 5, 2008 `ask'
Rupinder Kaur
State of Punjab
Ashutosh Mohunta
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
