The court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the reference application under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was forwarded to the Reference Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
CWP No. 26 of 2008 Date of decision:8.5.2008
Bhupinder Singh
Petitioner
Versus
U.T.Chandigarh and others
Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.KUMAR HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr.PC Dhiman, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms.Lisa Gill, Advocate, for the respondents.
M.M.KUMAR, J.
A short written statement has been filed by respondent No.3 on behalf of all the respondents in the Court today, a copy thereof has been furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner. It has been pointed out that the reference application filed by the petitioner, under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, stands already forwarded to the Reference Court .
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents and the statement made in the written statement, the writ petition is disposed as having been rendered infructuous.
(M.M.KUMAR) JUDGE
(SABINA) JUDGE
May 08, 2008 anita
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhupinder Singh
U.T. Chandigarh
M.M.KUMAR
SABINA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
