The court vested an existing conditional anticipatory bail order made on 19.9.2006 to an absolute form. This decision was based on the submissions that the petitioner has joined the investigation and custodial interrogation is not required.
The order of 19.9.2006 granting anticipatory bail is made absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc.No.57196-M of 2006
Gurinder Pal Kaur Vs. State of Punjab
Present : Mr. Balram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. B.S. Baath, AAG, Punjab.
Prayer in this petition is, for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.57 dated 18.4.2006, registered under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station B. Division, Amritsar.
Vide order of this Court dated 19.9.2006, it was directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, she shall be released on bail, subject to the conditions enumerated therein.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has joined investigation, therefore, her custodial interrogation is not required.
Counsel for the State of Punjab, does not deny the aforementioned fact and states that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required.
In view of what has been stated above, the order of this Court dated 19.9.2006 is made absolute, subject to the provisions of Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.
This petition stands disposed of accordingly.
6.11.2006 ( RAJIVE BHALLA ) GS JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to make anticipatory bail absolute given that custodial interrogation is not required.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Gurinder Pal Kaur
State of Punjab
RAJIVE BHALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
