Petitioner sought facility upgrade to B class. With Director General of Prisons having rejected the prayer via a speaking order, the court permitted withdrawal with liberty to challenge.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the speaking order from the Director General of Prisons.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. 10770-M of 2006 DATE OF DECISION : 01.12.2006
Karambir
.... PETITIONER
Versus
State of Haryana and others
..... RESPONDENTS
CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. A.S. Trikha, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. S.S. Mor, Senior DAG, Haryana.
Counsel for the petitioner states that since the Director General of Prisons, Haryana, has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for providing B class facility by passing a speaking order, therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to challenge the said order.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
December 01, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE
Karambir
State of Haryana
SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
