Disposed¶23

Shatrughan Sau @ Shatrughan Sav v. The Union of India respresented by Shri Chhatrasal Singh, the General Manager

Patna HC16 Jan 2026MJC/877/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, MJC No.877 of 2025 in Miscellaneous Appeal No.263 of 2019, order dated 16-01-2026 by Sunil Dutta Mishra, J. Contempt petition by Shatrughan Sau @ Shatrughan Sav against Union of India (Railways), General Manager East Central Railway, Hazipur, for non-compliance of order dated 07.08.2024. Compliance admitted, Civil Review No.324 of 2024 pending, unconditional apology tendered, petitioner consented; contempt proceeding dropped, MJC disposed, personal appearance dispensed with, I.A. No.01 of 2025 disposed.

What did the court decide?

M.J.C.-contempt proceeding dropped and petition disposed of; personal appearance of the opposite party-General Manager dispensed with; I.A. No.01 of 2025 disposed of ¶23

Shatrughan Sau @ Shatrughan Sav Vs The Union of India respresented by Shri Chhatrasal Singh, the General Manager — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.877 of 2025 In

¶2

Miscellaneous Appeal No.263 of 2019

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Shatrughan Sau @ Shatrughan Sav S/o Late Anakshdev Sau, Resident of Village- Bhawanipur, P.O and P.S- Deo, Distt- Aurangabad (Bihar), at present residing at Village- Manjhaulia, PO- Navgarh, PS- Amas, Distt- Gaya (Bihar).

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The Union of India represented by Shri Chhatrasal Singh, the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hazipur.

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

======================================================

¶10

Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Mohan Murari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha, Sr. C.G.C. Mr. Anwar Karim, C.G.C.

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 16-01-2026

¶15

The present M.J.C.-contempt petition has been filed

¶16

for non-compliance of order dated 07.08.2024 passed in Miscellaneous Appeal No.263 of 2019 by this Court.

¶17

In this regard, vide order dated 05.12.2025, the opposite party-General Manager, East Central Railway, Hazipur was directed to appear in person before this Court on 16.01.2026.

¶18

Interlocutory Application No.01 of 2025 has been filed on behalf of answering opposite party to exempt from his personal appearance.

¶19

Learned senior counsel for the opposite partyUnion of India (Railways) submits that the order dated 07.08.2024 passed by this Court has already been complied with and there was no willful or deliberate disobedience of order of

¶20

Patna High Court MJC No.877 of 2025(4) dt.16-01-2026 2/2

¶21

this Court. He also submits that the answering opposite party had already preferred Civil Review No.324 of 2024 which is pending for adjudication. Learned senior counsel for the opposite party has tendered an unconditional apology for the same and submits that the order of personal appearance of the said opposite party may be exempted.

¶22

Learned counsel for petitioner has no objection to this prayer on behalf of the opposite party and submits that in view of compliance of the order dated 07.08.2024 passed in Miscellaneous Appeal No.263 of 2019, this M.J.C. may be disposed of.

¶23

In view of the submissions on behalf of the parties that the Union of India (Railways) has already complied with the order aforesaid, the proceeding of M.J.C.-contempt is dropped. Accordingly, the M.J.C. petition is disposed of.

¶24

The order dated 05.12.2025 in which opposite party-General Manager, East Central Railway, Hazipur was directed to appear in person before this Court is dispensed with.

¶25

I.A. No.01 of 2025 stands disposed of.

¶26

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)

¶27

harish/-

¶28

Shatrughan Sau @ Shatrughan Sav v. The Union of India respresented by Shri Chhatrasal Singh, the General Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shatrughan Sau @ Shatrughan Sav v. The Union of India respresented by Shri Chhatrasal Singh, the General Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramvilas Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Om Raj Kumar @ Om Raj Vs The State of Bihar

Ashish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ran Vijay Kumar @ Ranvijay Kumar Gupta Vs Sanjay Kumar

Niraj Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Singh @ Bullet @ Abhishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar