Disposed¶22

Anita Devi v. Jitendra Kumar

Patna HC16 Jul 2026MA/419/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court MA No. 419 of 2026, decided 16-07-2026 by Rajiv Roy, J. Appeal against order dated 25.02.2026 in Misc. Case No. 13/2019 (Sub-Judge 1st, Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jehanabad) dismissing an Order XXI Rule 58 CPC application in execution of a money decree without adjudicating the claimants' right, title and interest over the attached properties. Appeal disposed of with liberty to seek redressal before the concerned authority/court; pending I.A.s disposed. No merits adjudicated by this Court. Keywords: third-party objection in execution, Order XXI Rule 58, right title interest, money decree, attachment, Jehanabad, Gaya.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the appellants to approach the concerned authority/court for the redressal of their grievance; the appeal and any pending I.A. disposed of. ¶22

Anita Devi Vs Jitendra Kumar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.419 of 2026

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Anita Devi Wife of- Ravi Kumar, Resident of Vill.- Suryapur Tulsi, TolaHulasganj, Post and P.S.- Hulasganj, Dist.- Jehanabad, Bihar.

¶4

Devanti Devi, Wife of Mahendra Prasad Resident of Vill.- Suryapur Tulsi, Tola- Hulasganj, Post and P.S.- Hulasganj, Dist.- Jehanabad, Bihar.

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

Jitendra Kumar Son of Late Suresh Prasad, Resident of Vill.- Kewari, P.OTajpur, P.S.- Khijarsarai, Dist.- Gaya.

¶8

Rakesh Kumar, Son of Late Krishna Sao @ Lalbabu, Resident of Vill.Surajpur, Post and P.S.- Hulasganj, Dist.- Jehanabad.

¶9

Deepak Kumar, Son of Late Krishna Sao @ Lalbabu Resident of Vill.Surajpur, Post and P.S.- Hulasganj, Dist.- Jehanabad.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 16-07-2026 Heard the parties.

¶15

The present appeal has been preferred:

¶16

“against the order dated 25.02.2026, passed in Misc. Case No.-13/2019, whereby and whereunder an application filed by the appellate under Order-XXI, Rule-58 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been dismissed by the learned Sub-Judge 1^st , Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jehanabad, without adjudicating the right, title and interest of the appellant, over the property which have been brought in the subject matter of

¶17

Patna High Court MA No.419 of 2026(3) dt.16-07-2026 2/2

¶18

the execution proceeding to satisfying the money

¶19

decree.”

¶20