Dismissed¶¶22

Umesh Singh v. Smt. Gunja Devi

Patna HC22 Apr 2026FA/67/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

First Appeal No.67 of 2022, High Court of Judicature at Patna, decided 22-04-2026 by Rudra Prakash Mishra, J. Dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution; appellants' repeated default — failure to comply with order dated 24.11.2025 despite time extensions granted on 06.02.2026 and 23.03.2026; no appearance by any party or counsel; appellants deemed to have lost interest. Procedural/default dismissal only; no merits decided, no statutes or cases cited.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶¶22

Umesh Singh Vs Smt. Gunja Devi — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA FIRST APPEAL No.67 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Umesh Singh son of Late Mathura Prasad Singh, Resident of Village Berhna Saidpur, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna.

¶4

Dinesh Singh son of Late Mathura Prasad Singh, Resident of Village Berhna Saidpur, P.S.- Barh, District- Patna.

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

Smt. Gunja Devi wife of Late Jugal Singh, resident of Village Aunta, P.S.Mokama, District- Patna.

¶8

Smt. Mithilesh Devi wife of Pramod Singh, resident of village Moldiar Tola, Mokama, P.S. - Mokama, District- Patna.

¶9

Smt. Geeta Devi wife of Rabindra Singh, resident of Village Magalpura, P.S. - Bakhtiarpur, District- Patna.

¶10

Smt. Reeta Devi wife of Baban Singh, resident of village Auta, P.S. - Mokama, District- Patna.

¶11

Smt. Kavita Devi wife of Surendra Singh, resident of Village Aunta, P.S.Mokama, District- Patna.

¶12

Smt. Anita Devi wife of Jitendra Singh, resident of Village- Shankarwar Tola, Mokama, P.S. - Mokama, District-Patna.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : None For the Respondent/s : None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶15

ORAL ORDER

¶16

9 22-04-2026 None appeared on behalf of the parties.

¶17

Earlier, on 06.02.2026, on the prayer of learned

¶18

counsel for the Appellants, six weeks’ time was granted to comply the order dated 24.11.2025, but the said order has not been complied. Thereafter, on 23.03.2026 none appeared on behalf of the parties, but in the interest of justice one month’s further time was granted to the appellants to comply with the

¶19

Patna High Court FA No.67 of 2022(9) dt.22-04-2026 2/2

¶20

earlier orders passed in this case. It appears that the appellants

¶21

have lost interest in pursing the matter.

¶22