Dismissed¶19

Lakshman Paswan @ Pokiya v. The state of bihar

Patna HC1 May 2026CR. MISC./26982/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: modification of bail order; furnishing of bail bonds; delay in framing of charge; absconding co-accused; bail after framing of charge; ACJM-VI Nawada; Hisua P.S. Case No. 442 of 2024; Cr. Misc. No. 32939 of 2025; Cr. Misc. No. 26982 of 2026; Lakshman Paswan @ Pokiya; State of Bihar; Patna High Court; Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra; modification application dismissed 01-05-2026; direction to Trial Court to frame charge.

What did the court decide?

No relief to the petitioner; prayer for modification of the bail condition refused. Trial Court directed to take necessary steps for framing of charge against the petitioner. ¶19

Lakshman Paswan @ Pokiya Vs The state of bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26982 of 2026

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32939 of 2025

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-442 Year-2024 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Lakshman Paswan @ Pokiya S/O Late Dwarika Paswan Resident Of Village - Nayatola Sangatper, P.S- Bakhtiyarpur, Dist- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 01-05-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 11.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32939 of 2025 by which the petitioner was granted bail in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 442 of 2024, to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-VI, Nawada.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 11.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32939 of 2025 the petitioner was granted bail after framing of charge, if not already framed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that out of six accused persons, five accused persons have been

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26982 of 2026(3) dt.01-05-2026 2/2

¶17

released on bail and out of them some are absconding and as a result, due to the said reason charges against the petitioner have not yet been framed for the last seven months and nor are likely to be framed in future. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, submits that it has been more than seven months since the petitioner was granted bail but his bail bonds could not be furnished due to the said reason. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, prays that the said condition imposed in paragraph no. 8 of the aforesaid bail order be modified.

¶18

Having perused the record and considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court finds no reason to interfere with the aforesaid order.

¶19

Accordingly, the modification application is dismissed.

¶20

Learned Trial Court is directed to take necessary steps for framing of charge against the petitioner.

¶21

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶22

Rajorshi/-

¶23

U T

Lakshman Paswan @ Pokiya v. The state of bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lakshman Paswan @ Pokiya v. The state of bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Nath Jha Vs Rajeshwar Singh

Umesh Singh Vs Smt. Gunja Devi

Abhishek Kumar Vs Awadhesh Kumar Mahto

Bechan Shahni Vs The State of Bihar

Sanoj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Jairam Yadav Vs The State of Bihar