Nityanand Singh v. The Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Trained teacher pay scale; Panchayat Teacher; Prakhand Teacher; Nagar Teacher; Primary Teacher; B.Ed qualification; six month bridge course dated 11.06.2019; Matric trained scale; IGNOU two years module; LPA No. 1699 of 2013; CWJC No. 9416 of 2019 (Satyendra Kumar Ojha); Memo No. 1790 dated 16.10.2024; CWJC No. 11300 of 2025; SLP (Civil) Diary No. 37663 of 2018; All India Groundnut Syndicate Ltd v CIT AIR 1954 Bombay 232; Bihar State Litigation Policy 2011 Rule 4.C(1); writ of mandamus; arrears with statutory interest; consequential benefits; representation to Director Primary Education; reasoned and speaking order; Patna High Court; Harish Kumar, J; oral judgment; NAFR; batch disposal with directions.
What did the court decide?
No substantive entitlement adjudicated; all writ petitions in the batch disposed of with directions: petitioners to submit fresh representation with a copy of the order within four weeks; Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna to consider the representations preferably within twelve weeks and pass a reasoned and speaking order in light of LPA No. 1699 of 2013, CWJC No. 9416 of 2019, CWJC No. 11300 of 2025 and Memo No. 1790 dated 16.10.2024, keeping in mind the Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011 (especially Rule 4.C (1)).