The High Court of Patna dismissed the writ petition as infructuous upon submission by counsel that the matter ceased to have any subsistence during its pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9692 of 2017
======================================================
S. M. Zaheer Alam Teachers Training College Son of late S.M. Zareef AT P.O.P.S- Bahera, Distt- Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sarva Deo Singh, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shri Nath Pathak ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
23 18-08-2026
At the outset, Mr. Sarva Deo Singh, learned Advocate for the petitioner fairly submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the matter has become infructuous and, as such, on instruction, he is not pressing the present application.
(Harish Kumar, J)
sumit/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
S. M. Zaheer Alam Teachers Training College
National Council For Teacher Education
Regional Director, Eastern Regional Committee
HARISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
