Sukrity Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5967 of 2026

Sukrity Yadav Wife of Nand Kishore, Resident of Vifllage- Naurangabad, P.S.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali at present resident of Flat No. 202, Sai Sarika Sadan Bihar, Urja Nagar, Danapur Khagaul Road, P.S.- Danapur, DistrictPatna.

¶3

... ... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶6

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. District Magistrate, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Education Officer, Patna, Bihar.

¶8

... ... Respondent/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shashank Shekhar For the Respondent/s : Mr.Government Pleader 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 08-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

counsel for the respondent-State.

¶12

With the consent of the parties, this writ application

¶13

is being disposed of at this stage itself.

¶14

The petitioner, in the present writ application,

¶15

has prayed for the grant of the following relief:-

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.5967 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 2/4

¶17

“For issuance of Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order, direction, commanding the Respondent Authorities take an immediate decision upon application/Grievance filed by the petitioner for her transfer on the to ground of distance within the district and allot her any of the school of her opted choices given on e-Shiksha Kosh portal and redressed her raised grievance as she has been allotted a school which she never opted for her transfer and distance of her present place of posting is more than previous one.”

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that similar matters have been disposed of, vide order dated 29.01.2026 passed in CWJC No. 1251 of 2026, vide order dated 19.02.2026 passed in CWJC No. 2693 of 2026, vide order dated 13.03.2026 passed in CWJC No. 2930 of 2026, and vide order dated 27.04.2026 passed in CWJC No. 5577 of 2026 and, accordingly, he prays that this case may also be disposed of in terms of those orders.

¶19

To the aforesaid prayer made by the learned

¶20

counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State does not have any objection.

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.5967 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 3/4

¶22

Considering the fact that similar matters have already been considered and disposed of, details of which have been given in the aforementioned paragraph, the present writ application is also disposed of in terms of those orders, and the petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh representation before the District Education Officer, Patna, within 15 days from today. If such a representation is filed by the petitioner within the stipulated time, the District Education Officer, Patna is directed to dispose of the same within a further period of one month from the date of receipt of the representation, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.

¶23

Needless to emphasize that the final order, which shall be passed District Education Officer, Patna, should be a reasoned and speaking order.

¶24

It is further made clear that in case the petitioner is found entitled to the relief, which the petitioner would be seeking through the representation, the same should be extended to the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of passing of the final order by the District Education Officer, Patna

¶25

With the aforesaid observation/direction and liberty granted, this writ application stands disposed of.

¶26

Patna High Court CWJC No.5967 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026 4/4

¶27

All pending interlocutory application(s), if any,

¶28

shall also be deemed to have been disposed of.

¶29

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

¶30

HR/-

¶31

U

Sukrity Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sukrity Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sujeet Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Rambalak Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Awtar Singh Vs The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua

Ramvilas Singh @ Ram Bilash Singh Vs The State of Bihar represented through Mr. Pankaj Kumar, The Principal Secretary

Uday Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary