Rambalak Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30630 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2025 Thana- MANPUR District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Tedhi Yadav @ Dedhi Yadav S/o Bhagat Yadav R/o Village - Bakulahiya, P.S - Manpur, District - West Champaran

¶5

Jalsor Yadav S/o Janak Yadav R/o Village - Bakulahiya, P.S - Manpur, District - West Champaran

¶6

Sawal Yadav S/o Khedaru Yadav R/o Village - Bakulahiya, P.S - Manpur, District - West Champaran

¶7

Vishram Yadav S/o Bhrahmdev Yadav R/o Village - Bakulahiya, P.S - Manpur, District - West Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 31553 of 2026

¶14

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2025 Thana- MANPUR District- West Champaran

¶15

====================================================== Rambalak Yadav S/O Jang Bahadur Yadav R/O Village- Bakulahiya, P.SManpur, Distt.- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶20

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30630 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the State : Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia For the Informant Mr. Gauri Shankar Thakur (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 31553 of 2026) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the State Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia For the Informant Mr. Gauri Shankar Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶21

2 07-05-2026

¶22

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶23

learned A.P.P. for the State, assisted by learned counsel for the

¶24

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30630 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 2/4

¶25

informant.

¶26

Since both the cases arise out of the same FIR, they have been heard together, and are being disposed of by this common order.

¶27

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS in connection with Manpur P.S Case No. 119 of 2025.

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to previous land dispute and animosity with intention to harass the petitioners. There is case and counter case and both sides received injuries.

¶29

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

¶30

Arising out the same incident, the informant’s side is an accused in Manpur P.S Case No. 120/2025 under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 76 of the B.N.S lodged by petitioner no. 2 Jalsor Yadav. This clearly indicates that there was a free-fight between two sides, which has resulted in injuries to both sides.

¶31

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30630 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 3/4

¶32

Anticipatory bail has already been granted to the informant’s side in Manpur P.S Case No. 120 of 2025, which has brought on record by way of Annexure-6 series. Anticipatory bail, in particular, has been granted to Jitan Yadav, who is the informant of this case. Under these circumstances, I am inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to petitioners of both the cases.

¶33

Let the petitioners of both the cases, as named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction learned ACJM 1^st Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Manpur P.S.Case No. 119 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and subject to further condition that :-

¶34

(i) the petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation/ trial.

¶35

(ii) the learned court below would, however, verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioners, and in case it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of

¶36

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30630 of 2026(2) dt.07-05-2026 4/4

¶37

bail bonds of the petitioners. However, it is expected that the verification process would be done expeditiously without causing any delay.

¶38

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)

¶39

HR/-

¶40

U T

Rambalak Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rambalak Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Budhan Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Pinki Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Raju Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sujeet Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Ramesh Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Sah @ Nagendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar