Disposed¶23

Anil Kumar Karak v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Feb 2026CWJC/541/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anil Kumar Karak v. State of Bihar, Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.541 of 2024, Patna High Court, decided 03-02-2026 by Dr. Anshuman, J. Pay scale revision; arrears of payment; supplementary counter affidavit by respondent nos. 4 & 5 (District Magistrate, Darbhanga; Circle Officer, Alinagar); Department of Finance, Government of Bihar; 90-day direction to assure payment upon production of representation; writ petition disposed of. No statute or precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondents to assure payment to the petitioner in light of the entitlement accepted in the supplementary counter affidavit, within 90 days from the date of production of the representation by the petitioner before the authority concerned. ¶23

Anil Kumar Karak Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.541 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Anil Kumar Karak Son of Late Badri Narayan Karak Resident of MohallaBidyapati Nagar, Ward No.- 48, P.S.- Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Deputy Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

¶10

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

¶11

The Circle Officer, Alinagar, Darbhanga.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

======================================================

¶14

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiv Pratap, Advocate Ms. Kumari Shalini, Advocate For the State : Mr. Swapnil Kr. Singh (AC to GP-19) ======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶16

5 03-02-2026

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶18

counsel for the State.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of order no.4 dated 10.07.2025, a supplementary counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 4 & 5 on 23.08.2025. Counsel submits that in light of the pleadings made in supplementary counter affidavit, the grievance of the petitioner has been settled and his pay scale has been revised as per his wish. He further submits that the arrears of the payment of the petitioner in the light of the pleadings made in the supplementary counter affidavit has not been made. He submits

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.541 of 2024(5) dt.03-02-2026 2/2

¶21

that the writ petition may be disposed off granting a specified period to the respondents to assure payment in accordance with the pay scale fixed by the respondents.

¶22

In the light of the submissions made, it transpires that Annexures- R/A, R/B & R/C have been attached in this petition and in this regard, the grievance of the petitioner has been settled. The respondents are directed to assure the payment to the petitioner in the light of the entitlement accepted in the supplementary counter affidavit, within 90 days from the date of production of the representation by the petitioner before the authority concerned.

¶23

Accordingly, with the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed off.

¶24

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶25

Divyansh/-

¶26

Anil Kumar Karak v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar Karak v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anshu Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Dhari Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Dr. Ankita Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Anubhuti Srivastava Vs The State of Bihar

Anup Lal Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Rajiv Kumar Ranjan Vs The State of Bihar