Disposed¶29

Amardeep Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jul 2026CWJC/3660/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CWJC 3660 of 2025; Patna High Court; Vikash Kumar, J; encroachment removal; Khata No. 802 Plot No. 2010; Village Siswa Maldahiya; Anchal Harsiddhi; East Champaran; representation dated 12.06.2024; Circle Officer Harsiddhi; direction to decide representation in eight weeks; writ petition disposed; mandamus; Land Reforms Department; State of Bihar; private respondents Hakim Miya, Wasir Miya, Ali Akbar Miya.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent no. 4, the Circle Officer, Harsiddhi, District East Champaran, to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 12.06.2024 within a period of eight weeks. ¶29

Amardeep Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3660 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Amardeep Kumar Son of Shukla Prasad @ Shukul Sah, Resident of Village Siswa Maldahiya, P.S. Harsiddhi, District- East Champaran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, East Champaran at Motihari.

The Deputy Collector of Land Reforms, Areraj, District - East Champaran.

¶12

The Circle Officer, Harsiddhi, District - East Champaran.

¶13

The Officer Incharge, Harsiddhi Police Station, District East Champaran.

¶14

Hakim Miya, Son of Late Jangi Miya, Resident of village Maldahiya, P.S. Harsiddhi, District East Champaran.

¶15

Wasir Miya, Son of Late Jangi Miya, Resident of village Maldahiya, P.S. Harsiddhi, District East Champaran.

¶16

Ali Akbar Miya, Son of Wakil Miya, Resident of village Maldahiya, P.S. Harsiddhi, District East Champaran.

¶17

... ... Respondent/s

¶18

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar No.1, Advocate Dr. Anjani Pd. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, SC-13 Mr. Hitesh Suman, AC to SC-13 ======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶20

2 24-07-2026 Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar No. 1, learned counsel for

¶21

the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy, SC-13, learned counsel for the State.

¶22

The petitioner in the present writ application has

¶23

prayed for the following reliefs:-

¶24

“(i) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents for removal the encroachment bearing Khata No. 802, Plot No. 2010, under the Village of Siswa Maldahiya, Anchal Harsiddhi, District

¶25

Patna High Court CWJC No.3660 of 2025(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/2

¶26

East Champaran;

¶27

(ii) For any other relief/s which the petitioner is legally entitled.”

¶28

At the outset, the petitioner confines his prayer for consideration of his representation by the respondent authorities.

¶29

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no. 4, the Circle Officer, Harsiddhi, District East Champaran to consider and disposed of the representation dated 12.06.2024 filed by the petitioner within a period of eight weeks.

¶30

(Vikash Kumar, J)

¶31

sweta/-

¶32

Amardeep Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amardeep Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subodhkant Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Nasim Ahmed Vs The State of Bihar

Uttam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Chandra Vs The State of Bihar

Mohamad Isatiyak @ Md. Isatiyak Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar