Disposed¶25

Kumari Vibha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Jan 2026CWJC/20583/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna HC, CWJC 20583/2025, decided 06-01-2026 (Purnendu Singh, J.). Sale Deed 04.11.2003 wrongly shows Plot No. 1094 instead of Plot No. 1191; mutation blocked; land acquired; compensation unpaid. Grievance not redressable unless Sale Deed rectified by competent Civil Court; petitioner's own inaction; liberty given to sue in Civil Court for correction of deed; writ application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to avail remedy before the competent Civil Court for correction of the Sale Deed dated 04.11.2003; the writ application was disposed of. ¶25

Kumari Vibha Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20583 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Kumari Vibha Wife of Ravindra Kumar Yadav, Resident of Village-Saharkola, P.S.- Basantpur, District-Siwan.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate, Siwan.

¶8

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Siwan.

¶9

The Circle Officer Basantpur, Siwan.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shakil Ahmad Khan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Shweta Anand, AC to GP-13 ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 06-01-2026 Heard Mr. Shakil Ahmad Khan, learned counsel

¶16

appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. Shweta Anand, learned counsel for the respondent/s.

¶17

At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to make certain necessary correction in the writ petition, in course of the day.

¶18

Permission is accorded.

¶19

It is the case of the petitioner that in the Sale Deed dated 04.11.2003, plot number has wrongly been described as 1094 in place of Plot No. 1191 leading to complication in respect of getting the said land mutated in the name of the petitioner. The said land has subsequently been acquired

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.20583 of 2025(2) dt.06-01-2026 2/2

¶21

resulting into non payment of compensation to the petitioner.

¶22

This Court finds that the petitioner is facing such difficulty due to his own inaction and unless and until, the Sale Deed dated 04.11.2003 is rectified by a competent Civil Court, the grievance of the petitioner cannot be redressed.

¶23