Techniwas Electronic Vikash Sansthan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jul 2026CWJC/16395/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CWJC No.16395 of 2022, decided 23-07-2026 by Justice Rajiv Roy; writ of mandamus; removal of encroachment over government/public land; Tauzi No. 8919; Khata No. 352; S.P. No. 707; 4 Kattha 11 Dhurs; Mauza Tekniwas; Circle Revilganj/Rivilganj; Saran at Chhapra; land and revenue department; counter-affidavit disclosing initiated proceeding; petition disposed of with liberty to approach the Court afresh; no costs, no interim mandamus.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court afresh as and when the situation so arises; no mandamus issued at this stage. ¶¶25

Techniwas Electronic Vikash Sansthan Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16395 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Techniwas Electronic Vikash Sansthan Mahesh Sadan, Mohanpur, Punaichak, Patna, through its Secretary Devendra Kumar, male, aged about 62 years, Son of Late Pasupati Singh, Resident of Village- Majlishpur, P.S.- Kopa, DistrictSaran, Presently residing at Mahesh Sadan, Mohanpur, Punaichak, P.S.Shastrinagar, District-Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Department at Land and Revenue Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate-Cum-Collector, Saran at Chhapar.

¶8

The Superintendent of Police Saran at Chhapra.

¶9

The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Revilganj, Saran.

¶10

The Circle Officer, Revilganj, Saran.

¶11

The Station House Officer, Kopa, P.S.- Saran.

¶12

Shantanu Singh S/o Late Prabhunath Singh, R/o Mauza- Majlishpur, P.S. Kopa, Dist- Saran.

¶13

Sarita Devi W/o Shantanu Singh, R/o Maiza- Majlishpur, P.S.- Kopa, DistSaran.

¶14

Mostt. Kismato Kuer W/o Late Achhaibar Singh, R/o Mauza- Majlishpur, P.S.- Kopa, Dist- Saran.

¶15

... ... Respondent/s

¶16

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Prabhat Kuar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy (GP-18) Mr. Vivekanand Prasad, AC to GP-18 For the Resp. No. 8 : Mr. Parth Gaurav, Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Pandey, Advocate ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER

¶18

3 23-07-2026 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for

¶19

the petitioner and the State as also Mr. Parth Gaurav, learned counsel for the respondent no. 8.

¶20

The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

¶21

“for the issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus or an appropriate writ, order or

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.16395 of 2022(3) dt.23-07-2026 2/2

¶23

orders, direction or directions commanding the respondents authorities to remove the encroachment over public land appertaining to Tauzi No. 8919 Khata no. 352, S.P. No. 707 having an area of 4 Kattha 11 Dhurs, Situated at MauzaTekniwas, Thana No. 273, Circle-Rivilganj, Saran as it is registered in the name of Government for the purpose of the development of the petitioner (Institution), and further the petitioner also prays for other reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled under the law.”

¶24