Dismissed¶19

Gajendra Kumar @ Rajnish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jul 2026CR. MISC./47603/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.47603 of 2026; anticipatory bail rejected; Gajendra Kumar @ Rajnish Kumar v. State of Bihar; Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 245 of 2024; Bhojpur; Sections 307 and 34 IPC; section 27 Arms Act; FIR dated 16.06.2024; informant Prem Kumar Tripathi; CCTV footage; Sessions Judge order; four criminal antecedents; Justice Rajiv Roy; decided 22-07-2026.

What did the court decide?

Taking into account the facts and the learned Sessions Judge order recording the details of the case diary, no case of anticipatory bail is made out. ¶18

Gajendra Kumar @ Rajnish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47603 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2024 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Gajendra Kumar @ Rajnish Kumar S/o Shailesh Mauar Resident of Village - Situhari, P.S.- Narayanpur, District- Bhojpur at Present resident of village - Satya Shiv Nagar Behind D.P.S. Shool Ara, P.S.- Udawantnagar, DistrictBhojpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 22-07-2026 Heard the parties.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 245 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, lodged on 16.06.2024 by the informant Prem Kumar Tripathi.

¶14

As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while he was sitting at his tiles shop, the accused came on a motorcycle and opened fire. As the informant called DIAL 112, they escaped. This led to the F.I.R.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only because of criminal antecedent, he has been implicated, there is no supporting evidence in the present case.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47603 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/2

¶17

Learned APP has taken this Court to the learned Sessions Judge order to show that CCTV Footage has been procured and the role of the petitioner has been found. Further, submission is that the matter is of the year 2024 and he has four criminal antecedents.

¶18

Taking into account the aforesaid facts as also the perusal of the learned Sessions Judge order which records about the details of the case diary, no case of anticipatory bail is made out.

¶19

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

¶20

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶21

vinayak/-

¶22

U T

Gajendra Kumar @ Rajnish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gajendra Kumar @ Rajnish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

North Bihar Dairy and Dairy Products Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Nath Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Himatsingka, Director Shankar Motors Pvt.Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar

Jay Nandan Prasad @ Jay Nandan Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Nawab Parwez Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Prasad Vs The State of Bihar