Disposed¶17

Chandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Jun 2026CWJC/15656/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Chandan Kumar v. State of Bihar; CWJC No.15656 of 2025; Patna High Court; Justice A. Abhishek Reddy; Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation (BSTDC); Tourism Department; District Magistrate Patna; interest on delayed payment; principal amount already paid; liberty to file representation; representation to be considered in accordance with law; writ petition disposed of; Gaya; payment of dues; no adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to make a suitable representation before the concerned authority for payment of interest on the delayed payment; any such representation to be considered in accordance with law. ¶17

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15656 of 2025

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Chandan Kumar Son of Mahendra Singh, Resident of Village- Dhanawan, P.O- Bagdaha, P.S- Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya- 823004.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary Tourism Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, through its Managing Director, Beerchand Patel Path, Patna-800001.

¶8

The Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, Beerchand Patel Path, Patna-800001.

¶9

¶10

The District Magistrate, Patna.

¶11

The Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise Tax and Service Tax Division, Gaya.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (26) For the BSIDC : Ms. Anukriti Jaipuriyar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Divit Vinod, Adv. ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER

¶14

8 29-06-2026

¶15

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner in so far as the amount due to the petitioners has already been complied with. However, learned counsel submits that the interest on the delayed payment has not been made.

¶16

Having regard to the above made submissions, the

¶17

present writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make a suitable representation before the concerned authority for payment of the interest. If any such representation

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.15656 of 2025(8) dt.29-06-2026 2/2

¶19

is made, the same shall be considered in accordance with law.

¶20

With the above directions, the present writ petition

¶21

stands disposed of.

¶22

(A. Abhishek Reddy , J)

¶23

Gauravkr/-

¶24

Chandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parsooram Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bansi Das, Vs The state of Bihar

Kamkhya Narayan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Kundan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Lal Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Atul Abhishek Vs The State of Bihar