Disposed

Enakshi Ghosh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Aug 2026CWJC/11712/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge order disposing of a writ petition in writ jurisdiction. The court directed the concerned authority to redress the grievance with a reasoned order within six weeks, provided opportunity of hearing if the claim was not lawful, and subsequently disposed of the application.

What did the court decide?

Directed the authority to redress grievance within six weeks via reasoned order with opportunity of hearing if claim is unlawful; application disposed.

Enakshi Ghosh Vs The State of Bihar — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11712 of 2026

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Enakshi Ghosh W/O Late Prasant Kumar Ghosh @ Prashant Kumar Ghosh, resident of Dahiyawa Tola, Chapra, P.S. Chapra Town, District Saran, Bihar

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

¶7

The Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna

¶8

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna

¶9

The District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra

¶10

The District Supply Officer, Saran at Chapra

¶11

The Treasury Officer, Saran at Chapra

¶12

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Chapra Branch, Pankaj Cinema Road, District Saran, Bihar

¶13

The Centralized Pension Processing Centre (CPPC), State Bank of India, Patna through its Manager. ... ... Respondent/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Surendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the AG : Mr.Amarshakti, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, SC 12 ======================================================

¶17

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH

¶18

ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 18-08-2026 Heard Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel

¶20

appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Amarshakti, learned counsel for the Accountant General and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned AAG 5 for the State.

¶21

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to file a detailed representation before the appropriate authority of the Food and Consumer Protection for the relief(s) as prayed for in the present writ petition.

¶22

The authority concerned must ensure to redress the grievance of the petitioner well within a period of six weeks by passing a reasoned order.

¶23

In case the claim of the petitioner is not found in accordance with law, the petitioner/representative should be provided with opportunity of hearing.

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.11712 of 2026(2) dt.18-08-2026 2/2

¶25

The present writ application is accordingly

¶26

disposed of.

¶27

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶28

chn/- U

Enakshi Ghosh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Enakshi Ghosh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Narayan Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Jha Vs The State of Bihar

Anjila Begum @ Anjila Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sharda Mestarani @ Sharda Mestarni No.2, Vs The State of Bihar

Suman Kumar Deva Vs The State of Bihar