17.01.2006 and prior to this date, the salary cannot be paid. Learned counsel further submitted that the said information contained in paragraph no. 6 of the counter affidavit is contrary, in respect of the petitioner, to the report submitted by the Justice S.C. Agrawal Commission as per the recommendation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Bihar & Ors. vs. Bihar Rajya M.S.E.S.K.K. Mahasangh & Ors. reported in (2005) 9 SCC 129 commonly known as Mahasangh case , wherein, the Apex Court has clarified that the date of absorption will be considered in respect of the petitioner from the date of his appointment/ date of eligibility apart from other requisite qualification required for the post. Learned counsel further submitted that similarly situated aggrieved employees had preferred CWJC No. 3017 of 2006, in which, this Court, after considering the entire facts including the number of sanctioned post, date of eligibility and date of appointment and also considering the report of Justice S.C. Agrawal Commission in terms of Section 4(1)(14) of the Bihar Universities Act, has given finding that no other date now can be inserted in view of the detailed enquiry made by the Justice S.C. Agrawal Commission in respect of the each teaching staff of M.L.S.M. College, Darbhanga.
