Dismissed¶19

Rehan Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jul 2026CWJC/10641/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; permission to withdraw granted; liberty to file fresh representation before authorities concerned who must act in accordance with law. Bench: Alok Kumar, J. Parties: Rehan Ahmad, Rizwan Ahmad, Md. Daniyal v. State of Bihar (Revenue and Land Reforms Department), Collector Araria, Circle Officer Araria, Dinesh Yadav. Keywords: withdrawal of writ petition, CWJC No.10641 of 2026, Patna High Court, fresh representation, Araria revenue authorities, dismissal as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file a fresh representation before the authorities concerned, who are to consider it in accordance with law. ¶19

Rehan Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10641 of 2026

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Rehan Ahmad Son of Naimuddin Ahmad, Resident of Haveli Tola, Ward No.04 Lahlaria, P.O- Bagnagar, Police Station- Araria, District-Araria.

¶4

Rizwan Ahmad, Son of Naeem Uddin Ahmad, Resident of Azad Nagar Ward No.-20

¶5

Md. Daniyal, Son of Naimuddin Ahmad, Resident of Hospital Road Land Mark Upper National Medical Hall Ward No.20 P.S and District- Araria.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Collector, Araria.

¶10

The Circle Officer, Araria, District- Araria.

¶11

Dinesh Yadav, S/o Late Iddi Yadav, Resident of Village- Lahlaia Gram Panchayat Chatar, P.S- Araria, District- Araria.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Abdul Wadood, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ravi Kumar, A.C to G.P-13 Mr. Akshay Lal Prasad, A.C to G.P-13 ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 24-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶16

counsel for the State.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition to file a fresh representation before the authorities concerned.

¶18

Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

¶19

As such, the present writ petition stands dismissed

¶20

as withdrawn, with a liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.10641 of 2026(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/2

¶22

representation before the authorities concerned and if such representation is filed by the petitioner, the authorities concerned will look into the issue and do the needful in accordance with law.

¶23

(Alok Kumar, J)

¶24

Bipin/-

¶25

Rehan Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rehan Ahmad v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gokul Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Niranjan Kumar @ Baba Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Narayan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Vipati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar