Manish Bharti @ Manish Kumar @ Manish Kumar Bharti Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9715 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-548 Year-2025 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MANISH BHARTI @ MANISH KUMAR @ MANISH KUMAR BHARTI S/o- Uday Singh @ Budhan Singh R/v- Hadsa Ps- Hisua Dist- Nawada.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar. ===================	... ... Opposite Party/s ===================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s :	Mr.Mrigendra Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : ===================	Mr.Ramesh Chandra, APP ==================================
CORAM: HONOURABL	E MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 17-02-2026

¶10

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶11

petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

¶12

The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 548 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

¶13

The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 228 litres of IMFL/country made liquor from the alleged tempo.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

¶15

submitted that petitioner is neither owner nor driver and not connected in any manner with the alleged tempo. It is submitted that alleged recovery of illicit liquor was made from the tempo,

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9715 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 2/3

¶17

which is accessible by general public and it can be said safely that recovery of alleged illicit liquor not appears to be made from the conscious physical possession of this petitioner. Explaining criminal antecedent of the petitioner, it is submitted that petitioner found involved in 16 more criminal cases and in most of the cases he is on bail. It is submitted that if merit of the case is otherwise convincing in favour of the petitioner merely on the basis of criminal antecedents, the prayer of bail ordinarily should not be declined. In support of his submission, learned counsel relied upon the legal report of Hon’ble Supreme Court available through

¶18

Prabhakar Tewari Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another

¶19

reported in (2020) 11 SCC 648.

¶20

Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as

¶22

recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not appears to be made from the conscious physical possession of this petitioner, accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-I, Nawada/concerned Court, where the case is

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9715 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 3/3

¶24

pending in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 548 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶25

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)

¶26

veena/-

¶27

U T

Manish Bharti @ Manish Kumar @ Manish Kumar Bharti v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Bharti @ Manish Kumar @ Manish Kumar Bharti v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murari Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Kumar @ Bittu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar