Vijay Mandal Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9656 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-244 Year-2025 Thana- KURSAILA District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vijay Mandal S/o Siyaram Mandal

¶5

Vikash Mandal @ Vikash Kumar, S/o Sikandar Mandal Both are R/o village- Madheli Malinia, P.S.- Kursela, District- Katihar

¶6

... ... Petitioners

¶7

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar Upadhyaya, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶8

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 17-02-2026

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶12

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

Both accused/petitioners are named in the FIR

¶14

and apprehending their arrest in connection with Kursela P.S.

¶15

Case No.244 of 2025 for offence under Section 30(a) of the

¶16

Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶17

Allegation against the petitioners is to engage in illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is recovery of 80 liters of IMFL/country-made liquor.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

¶19

submitted that the name of petitioners transpired on the basis

¶20

of suspicion arising out of disclosure made by local Choukidar.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9656 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 2/3

¶22

It is submitted that recovery of alleged illicit liquor was made beside Madheli Dam, which is an open place and accessible by general public. It is submitted that alleged recovery of illicit liquor was not made from conscious physical possession of petitioners. It is submitted that seizure list not appears supported by independent witnesses rather by police personnel. Both petitioners claimed clean antecedent.

¶23

Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

¶24

In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not appears to be made from conscious physical possession of petitioners, accordingly, both petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Exclusive Special Excise Court-II, Katihar/concerned court in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No.244 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9656 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 3/3

¶26

Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the

¶27

BNSS.

¶28

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

¶29

Sanjeet/- U T

Vijay Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Mandal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murari Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Kumar @ Bittu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Bharti @ Manish Kumar @ Manish Kumar Bharti Vs The State of Bihar