Two petitioners sought regular bail in a case involving a death by antemortem throttling. The court, weighing the gravity of the offence and the postmortem findings, declined bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8886 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-2025 Thana- Champanagar District- Purnia
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumit Kumar Bhagat, Advocate Mr. Shushant Kumar, Advocate Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Pathak, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, A.P.P Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR ORAL ORDER
A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8886 of 2026(4) dt.20-07-2026 2/2
17.06.2025.
(Alok Kumar, J)
Bipin/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioners for offences under BNS sections including 103(1), 238(A), 61 and 3(5).
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Manjhla Marandi
Bajum Soren @ Bachun Soren
The State of Bihar
Alok Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
