Allowed

Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Das v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Feb 2026CR. MISC./84229/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 504, 147, 148, 149 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act for bomb-throwing and firing allegations; injuries simple and petitioner in custody since 02.09.2025 with no antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount before Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chapra.

Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Das Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84229 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2023 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Das S/O Munni Lal Ram R/O Village- Narayanpur, Police Station- Garkha, District- Saran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mani Shankar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 19-02-2026

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 333 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 504, 147, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶16

The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner has thrown a bomb on the wall and the father of the informant got injured. It is further alleged that the petitioner has fired at the informant.

¶17

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84229 of 2025(4) dt.19-02-2026 2/2

¶19

case. From perusal of the injury report of the informant it will transpire that the informant has received two lacerated wound measuring 1/4” x 1/4”x 1/4” at lumber region. It has further been submitted that though the injuries are said to be caused by gunshot, the nature of injury is simple and the injuries are superficial one which is clear from the dimensions of the injury. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 02.09.2025.

¶20

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 333 of 2023.

¶22

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶23

lata/- U T

Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Ram @ Sanjay Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Jamshed Vs The State of Bihar

Shailesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sonamati Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Shankar Bind @ Ranjit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bihari Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Anuj Yadav @ Anuj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar