This Criminal Miscellaneous Application sought regular bail under BNSS, 2023. The Court noted the case was at the stage of argument, denied bail, and directed the trial court to conclude proceedings expeditiously.
Prayer for bail rejected; Trial Court directed to expedite trial at the earliest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7718 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2021 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar
======================================================
Govind Yadav @ Dhoni Yadav Son of Birendra Yadav @ Birendra Singh Resident of village - Bijhaura, Police Station - Itarhi, District - Buxar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Rai Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
5 08-05-2026
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7718 of 2026(5) dt.08-05-2026 2/2
petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.05.2021. He submits that on the previous occasion a report regarding stage of the Trial was called for.
bail of the petitioner and submits that report has come.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Mkr./-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to petitioner at the stage of argument given the FIR date of 2021.
Whether the trial court should be directed to expedite the pending trial.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Govind Yadav @ Dhoni Yadav
The State of Bihar
ANSHUMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
