Allowed

Bhirendra Yadav @ Bhirendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Apr 2026CR. MISC./7605/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application in a murder case where the petitioner was unnamed in the FIR and implicated on an alleged custodial confession with no recovery or eyewitness. The court considered the submissions and enlarged him on bail with two sureties, allowing the application.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, Jehanabad.

Bhirendra Yadav @ Bhirendra Yadav Vs The State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7605 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2025 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bhirendra Yadav @ Bhirendra Yadav S/o Late Ramlakhan Yadav R/o Village - Malahchak, P.S - Parasbigha, District - Jehanabad

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP For the informant : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

4 09-04-2026

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

¶12

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for

¶13

grant of regular bail in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 172 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶14

3 . As per the prosecution case, some unknown miscreants killed the husband of the informant when he had gone to the agricultural field to irrigate the same. The deceased sustained a gunshot injury.

¶15

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is not

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7605 of 2026(4) dt.09-04-2026 2/3

¶17

named in the FIR and he has been made accused in this case only on the basis of his self confessional statement before police while he was in police custody, which has got no evidentiary value. It has also been submitted that there is no eye-witness to the alleged occurrence of murder. No suspicion was initially raised against the petitioner; however, after a month, suspicion was raised against him in connection with a prior dispute. It has further been submitted that, apart from mere suspicion, there is no material on record against the petitioner to establish his complicity in the said occurrence. No incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner has clean criminal antecedent and is in custody since 23.09.2025.

¶18

5 . Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the informant has further submitted that there are strong suspicion against the petitioner supported with electronic evidence.

¶19

6 . Considering the aforesaid submissions of the parties and taking into account the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7605 of 2026(4) dt.09-04-2026 3/3

¶21

with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Jehanabad, in connection with

¶22

Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 172 of 2025.

¶23

7. The application stands allowed.

¶24

(Praveen Kumar, J)

¶25

Jyoti/-

¶26

U T

Bhirendra Yadav @ Bhirendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhirendra Yadav @ Bhirendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Bind Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pinku Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Singh @ Ravikant Vs the State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar @ Abhishek Bhardwaj Vs The State of Bihar

Sajam @ Saddam @ Md Saddam Vs The State of Bihar