Allowed¶16

Pinku Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Apr 2026CR. MISC./20147/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail granted in CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20147 of 2026 (Patna High Court, Praveen Kumar, J, 08-04-2026), arising from Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No. 401 of 2025, Siwan; offences under BNS Sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5); toilet-construction quarrel, axe and iron rod/spade assault allegations; simple injuries, single head injury attributed to co-accused Rinku Rai; land dispute; one criminal antecedent; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; conditions under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail: petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. ¶16

Pinku Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20147 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-401 Year-2025 Thana- JAMOBAZAR District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pinku Rai S/o Wakil Rai R/o Village - Baldiha, P.S - Jamo Bazar, District - Siwan

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma ======================================================

¶6

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 08-04-2026

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶9

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶10

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No. 401 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115, 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3 (5) of the BNS.

¶11

As per prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is of forming unlawful assembly and of abusing, and on the question of construction of toilet, quarrel took place and as per allegation with respect to petitioner, it has been alleged that coaccused Rinku Rai assaulted upon the head of the informant by means of axe on head specifically, thereafter, petitioner and Minku Rai also assaulted by means of iron rod and spade upon the informant.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20147 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2

¶14

admittedly there is land dispute between the parties and the quarrel took place suddenly without premeditation to kill. Moreover, the injuries sustained by the informant which is clear from Annexure-2 that the same is simple in nature and there happens to be only one injury on head which is specifically attributed to co-accused Rinku Rai. It has been submitted that petitioner has got one criminal antecedent and he is on bail.

¶15

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶16

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Siwan/concerned Court where the case is pending in connection with Jamo Bazar P.S. Case No. 401 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S.

¶17

(Praveen Kumar, J)

¶18

khushbu/-

Pinku Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pinku Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anish Raj @ Anish Thakur @ Anish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gulab Sheikh Vs The State of Bihar

Shashi Kishore @ Shishu Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Bind Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Inova Devi @ Indra Devi Vs The State of Bihar