Dismissed¶5

Rajballav Kumar @ Pritam Raj @ Rajballabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jul 2026CR. MISC./71962/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: cancellation of bail; suppression of criminal antecedents; antecedent in SC & ST Act case; Hisua P.S. Case No. 268 of 2023 (Nawada); IPC Ss. 147/148/149/323/341/379/307/324/325/427; Cr. Misc. No. 71962 of 2023; bail order dated 24.08.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 53154 of 2023; coordinate bench; Patna High Court; Sandep Kumar, J.; application rejected/dismissed.

What did the court decide?

On perusal of the impugned order, the criminal antecedent of opposite party no.2 was not a ground for granting bail to him, so the alleged suppression of antecedent does not impugn the bail order. ¶4

Rajballav Kumar @ Pritam Raj @ Rajballabh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71962 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-268 Year-2023 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJBALLAV KUMAR @ PRITAM RAJ @ RAJBALLABH KUMAR son of Birendra Yadav @ Birendra Kumar @ Bijendra Yadav Village- maulanagar Ps- Hisua Dist- Nawada

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

RAJ KUMAR SHARMA son of Nanhu Sharma @ Late Nanhuk Sharma Village- Maulanagar Ps- Hisua Dist- Nawada

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manisha Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 20-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned APP for the State.

¶13

2 . This application has been filed for cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party no. 2 by a coordinate bench of this Court vide order dated 24.08.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 53154 of 2023 in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 268 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 379, 307, 324, 325 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party no.2 on the ground that he had obtained bail by suppressing his criminal

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71962 of 2023(4) dt.20-07-2026 2/2

¶16

antecedent in a case registered for the offence under SC & ST Act.

¶17

4. From the perusal of the impugned order it appears that criminal antecedent of the opposite party no.2 was not a ground for granting bail to the opposite party no.2. Hence, I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order.

¶18

5. Accordingly, this application is rejected.

¶19

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶20

shalini/-

¶21

U T

Rajballav Kumar @ Pritam Raj @ Rajballabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajballav Kumar @ Pritam Raj @ Rajballabh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Yamuna Tiwari @ Vrajavihari Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Gautam Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rinki Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Farookh @ Md. Farook Vs The State of Bihar

Rajnish Kumar @ Rajneesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar