Allowed¶20

Basant Yadav @ Vasant Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Anticipatory bail – offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act

Patna HC7 Jan 2026CR. MISC./65210/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; provisional anticipatory bail; Section 30(a) Excise Act; Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.; liquor recovery 116.935 litres motorcycle; Bairiya P.S. Case No.166 of 2025; West Champaran; criminal antecedent verification; three cases threshold; bail bond Rs.15,000 two sureties; six weeks surrender; Patna High Court; Criminal Miscellaneous No.65210 of 2025; Satyavrat Verma J; 07-01-2026.

What did the court decide?

Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs.15,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions, with confirmation contingent on verification of antecedents (three cases only) by the trial court. ¶20

Basant Yadav @ Vasant Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65210 of 2025

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2025 Thana- BAIRIYA District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Basant Yadav @ Vasant Yadav S/o Late Rambadai Yadav Resident of village - Machhargawan Chowk, P.s.- Bairiya, Distt.- West Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sharad Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Pushpa Sinha ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 07-01-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of three cases and allegation is of recovery of 116.935 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chaukidar, but then, it is submitted that if Chaukidar was aware of the involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence,

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65210 of 2025(3) dt.07-01-2026 2/3

¶17

then why he did not inform the police prior to institution of the present F.I.R., which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on provisional anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Bairiya P. S. Case No.166 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

The application stands allowed.

¶21

It is made clear that the learned trial Court after accepting the provisional bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than three cases, then it would be presumed that petitioner for the purposes of obtaining anticipatory bail had concealed his antecedent before

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65210 of 2025(3) dt.07-01-2026 3/3

¶23

this Court, in that event, the present provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but if on verification, it is found that petitioner has antecedent of three cases only, in that event, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶24

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶25

vikash/-

¶26

U T

Basant Yadav @ Vasant Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Basant Yadav @ Vasant Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bittu Kumar @ Bittu Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Yogi Manjhi @ Yogi Majhi Vs The State of Bihar

Teni Soni Vs The State of Bihar

Pradyut Samanta Vs The State of Bihar

Vikky Yadav @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Kumar @ Vikky Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sujit Kumar @ Faram Vs The State of Bihar