Teni Soni Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62303 of 2025

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2025 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas

======================================================

Teni Soni S/o Late Lakshmi Seth @ Lakshmi Narayan Saw Resident of Purvi Mohan Bigha, Ward no. 15, P.S. - Dehri, District - Rohtas.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sangeeta Sharma ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 06-01-2026

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶10

A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of two cases under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 13 litres of liquor from the house of the petitioner. It is next submitted that petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and the house in question is a joint family property as such it cannot be alleged with certainty that it was petitioner, who had kept the liquor in the house or the liquor kept in the house was within his knowledge and after

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62303 of 2025(3) dt.06-01-2026 2/3

¶14

amendment in the Excise Act in the year 2018, the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender has been done away with and he came to be implicated at the instance of local person but then the name of the person who disclosed the name of the petitioner is not disclosed in the FIR which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.

¶15

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶16

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dehri (T) P.S. Case No.92/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

¶17

It is made clear that the learned trial court thereafter shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than two cases, in that event, it would be presumed that petitioner

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62303 of 2025(3) dt.06-01-2026 3/3

¶19

had concealed his antecedent before this court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if on verification it is found that petitioner has antecedent of two cases, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶20

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶21

amit/-

¶22

U T

Teni Soni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Teni Soni v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Ram @ Suraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manju Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar @ Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bittu Kumar @ Bittu Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Yogi Manjhi @ Yogi Majhi Vs The State of Bihar

Panna Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar