Allowed¶22

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Feb 2026CR. MISC./5877/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory-type bail (release in event of arrest); Patna High Court; Crl. Misc. No. 5877 of 2026; Turkauliya P.S Case No. 422 of 2025, East Champaran; offences under Sections 115(2), 75(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 324 (4), 3 (5) B.N.S.; allegations held general and omnibus, no specific allegation; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two like sureties; CJM East Champaran at Motihari; Section 482(2) B.N.S.S. conditions; Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya; decided 04-02-2026.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail allowed: petitioner to be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the trial court within six weeks, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned CJM, East Champaran at Motihari, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. ¶22

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶22

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, who apprehends arrest in Turkauliya P.S Case No. 422 of 2025 (offences under Sections 115(2), 75(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 324 (4) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S.), should be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender.

¶15

Court's answer

On perusal of the F.I.R., impugned order and record, there is no specific allegation against the petitioner; the allegation against him is general and omnibus in nature, and there is no allegation of the petitioner assaulting any person.

¶21

Ratio / Principle

The petitioner is to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the trial court within six weeks, on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, East Champaran at Motihari, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.

¶22

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail in event of arrest granted — Patna High Court (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J., 04-02-2026) allowed the Criminal Miscellaneous petition of Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Yadav, who apprehended arrest in Turkauliya P.S Case No. 422 of 2025 registered under Sections 115(2), 75(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 324 (4) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S. for alleged assault on the informant and his wife with lathi, danda and rod. Holding that there was no specific allegation against the petitioner and the allegation was general and omnibus in nature, the Court directed his release on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, East Champaran at Motihari, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5877 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2025 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East

¶3

Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Yadav, aged about 26 years (M), Son of Nawal Roy @ Nawal Yadav @ Nawal Ray R/o Village - Khagni, P.S. - Turkauliya, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjana Srivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 04-02-2026

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

APP for the State

¶15

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Turkauliya P.S Case No. 422 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 75(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 324 (4) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S.

¶16

As per the prosecution case, petitioner along with co-accused have assaulted the informant and his wife by means of lathi , danda and rod.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5877 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2

¶19

stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

¶20

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶21

From perusal of the F.I.R., impugned order and materials available on record it appears that there is no specific allegation allegation against the petitioner, whereas allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. There is no allegation against the petitioner to assaulting any person.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the trial court within a period of six weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Turkauliya P.S Case No. 422 of 2025 subject to the condition laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.

¶23

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶24

Mayank/-

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Most. Birata Kuer Vs Ramanuj Thakur

Most. Rukminia Vs Most. Piyariya Kuer

Anurag Kumar Vs Santosh Kumar Chokhani

Sanjay Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Dropadi Devi Vs The State of Bihar