Allowed

Dipak Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Aug 2026CR. MISC./57145/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed an application for provisional anticipatory bail under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The petitioner must surrender within six weeks and furnish bonds. Bail will be confirmed only if the trial court verifies clean criminal antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Granted provisional anticipatory bail pending trial court verification of criminal antecedents and satisfaction of conditions under Section 482(2) BNSS.

Dipak Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57145 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2026 Thana- GORIAKOTHI District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dipak Kumar Yadav Son of Hari Shankar Yadav Resident of Village - Panchneuri, Police Station - Guthani, District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 18-08-2026

¶13

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶15

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 95 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.

¶16

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized vehicle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57145 of 2026(2) dt.18-08-2026 2/3

¶18

create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that Raju would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged, who was also apprehended from the spot.

¶19

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶20

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Goreyakothi P.S. Case No. 55 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶21

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57145 of 2026(2) dt.18-08-2026 3/3

¶23

person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶24

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶25

Sumit/-

¶26

U T

Dipak Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dipak Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Prakash Mahto @ Jai Prakash Mahoto Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Bimlesh Kumar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Saurav Kumar @ Saurabh kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vinod Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Mohit Kanodia Vs The State of Bihar