Allowed¶16

Md. Tahir @ Tahir Khan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jul 2026CR. MISC./47563/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted; Patna High Court; Partha Sarthy J; 22-07-2026; Criminal Miscellaneous No.47563 of 2026; Pirbahore P.S. Case 349/2026; BNS 2023 sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 61(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5); FIR allegations of abuse and knife stabbing of informant's brother; dispute over a girl between Aman and Ayan; petitioner named in FIR with conspiracy allegation; false implication plea; custody since 23.4.2026; no criminal antecedent; bail bond Rs. 10,000; two like sureties; CJM Patna.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on regular bail in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 349 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. ¶16

Md. Tahir @ Tahir Khan Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶16

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, arraigned in Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 349 of 2026 for offences under the cited sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, should be enlarged on regular bail.

¶11

Court's answer

Having heard counsel and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR, the cause of occurrence stated therein, the investigation material evident from the order of the learned trial Court, his custody since 23.4.2026 and absence of criminal antecedents, the Court directed that the petitioner be enlarged on bail in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case no.349 of 2026.

¶16

Ratio / Principle

Enlargement on bail conditioned on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna.

¶16

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Patna High Court (Partha Sarthy, J.), 22-07-2026, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 47563 of 2026: Regular bail granted to Md. Tahir @ Tahir Khan in Pirbahore P.S. Case No. 349 of 2026, registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 61(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that Ayan and Sahil abused and stabbed the informant's brother, the occurrence being linked to a dispute over a girl between Aman and Ayan; the petitioner was named with a direct allegation of having entered into a conspiracy. Defence urged false implication, noting the assault was attributed mainly to Ayan and supported by co-accused Sahil, custody since 23.4.2026 and absence of criminal antecedents. Considering the FIR allegations, the cause of occurrence, the investigation material evident from the trial Court's order, the custody period and the clean antecedents, the Court enlarged the petitioner on a Rs. 10,000/- bail bond with two like sureties to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna.

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47563 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-349 Year-2026 Thana- PIRBAHOR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Md. Tahir @ Tahir Khan S/o Fazal Karim Resident of Fakirbara, Kutubuddin Lane Raja Baniya Gali, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP For the Informant : Mr. Shivjee Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 22-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶10

The petitioner has preferred this application for

¶11

grant of regular bail in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case no.349 of 2026 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 61(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶12

As per the prosecution case, the informant states that Ayan and Sahil started to abuse the informant’s brother. The petitioner was also present there. It is further stated that Ayan and Sahil stabbed the informant’s brother with a knife. The informant finally states that there was some dispute with respect to a girl between Aman and Ayan over which Ayan had threatened the informant’s brother.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47563 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. From the contents of the FIR itself, it would transpire that the cause of occurrence is a dispute over a girl between Aman and Ayan and the petitioner has no concern with the same. Even the allegation of assault is mainly on Ayan and it was supported by co-accused Sahil. The petitioner is in custody since 23.4.2026 and has no criminal antecedent.

¶15

The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner is named in the FIR and there is direct allegation against him of having entered into a conspiracy to give effect to the occurrence.

¶16

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the FIR, the cause of occurrence as given therein, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as evident from the order of the learned trial Court, the petitioner being in custody since 23.4.2026 and not having any criminal antecedent, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Pirbahore P.S. Case no.349 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47563 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3

¶18

like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial

¶19

Magistrate, Patna.

¶20

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶21

Saurabh/-

¶22

U T

Md. Tahir @ Tahir Khan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Tahir @ Tahir Khan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kumar Vs The State Bank of India

Deepak Kumar Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Subrat Kumar Dev Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Anand Kumar Vs The State of Bihar