Allowed

Bhim Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jul 2026CR. MISC./44534/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail petition under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 after alleged recovery of 130 litres of illicit country liquor. Court noted petitioner named in FIR, in custody since 21.05.2026, and absence of independent witness to the seizure, and granted bail.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two like sureties to 1st Special Judge Excise, Saran at Chapra, conditioned on appearing on every trial date.

Bhim Mahto Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44534 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-430 Year-2026 Thana- CHAPRA TOWN District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bhim Mahto, aged about 28 years, Gender-Male, Son of Aklu Mahto, Resident of Village - Roopganj, Adda No- 02, P.S. - Town (Nagar / Chapra Town), District - Saran at Chapra.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Meena Singh, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 08-07-2026

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶10

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Town (Nagar /Chapra Town) P.S. Case No. 430 of 2026 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022.

¶11

As per allegation in the FIR, total 130 litres of illicit country made liquor has been recovered from the three different sacks.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the name of the petitioner has been surfaced in this case on the basis of disclosure made by arrested co-accused persons. He further

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44534 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/3

¶14

submits that the petitioner has no concerned with the alleged seized country made liquor. He next submits that the the alleged spot is an open and public place which does not belongs to the petitioner. He lastly submits the petitioner is neither the owner nor the care taker of the alleged spot and the seized sacks. He again submits that nothing incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 21.05.2026.

¶15

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

¶16

From perusal of the FIR, seizure list and impugned order of the learned 01^st Exclusive Special Excise Court, Saran at Chapra dated 09.06.2026, it appears that petitioner is named in the FIR. From perusal of the records, it appears that on the basis of written report of the informant, FIR has been registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2022 against the above named petitioner and the allegation is recovery of 130 litres of illicit country made liquor from the three different sacks. Petitioner is in custody since 21.05.2026 and there is no any independent witness of the seizure list, so considering all these aspects of the case and submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, I am inclined to

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44534 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 3/3

¶18

grant regular bail to the above named petitioner.

¶19

Accordingly the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 1^st, Special Judge Excise, Saran at Chapra in connection with Town (Nagar/Chapra Town) P.S. Case No. 430 of 2026, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall physically present before the trial Court on each and every date as fixed by the trial Court and if the petitioner is absented, his bail bonds shall be cancelled.

¶20

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

¶21

Anand Kr.

¶22

U T

Bhim Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhim Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kavindra Singh @ Kamendra Singh Vs Sanjay Kumar

Bhola Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Jae Paswan @ Jay Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Saiyad Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeet Singh Vs The State of Bihar