Allowed¶20

Jae Paswan @ Jay Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Jul 2026CR. MISC./43544/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Cr. Misc. No.43544 of 2026; Jae Paswan @ Jay Paswan v. State of Bihar; bail; Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act 2022 Sections 30(a), 32, 41(i); 300 liters country made unriped liquor; Muffasil PS Case 852/2022; Motihari; East Champaran; Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I; custody since 06.05.2026; decided 08-07-2026; Ramesh Chand Malviya, J.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 852 of 2022. ¶20

Jae Paswan @ Jay Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43544 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-852 Year-2022 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jae Paswan @ Jay Paswan, Male, aged about 58 years, Son of Late Lakhan Paswan @ Late Sukhlal Paswan, Resident of Village - Pathaura Bankat, P.S.Muffasil, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prateek Tandon, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shaheen Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 08-07-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Amendment Act, 2022.

¶15

As per allegation in the FIR, total 300 liters of country made unriped liquor has been recovered.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner nor the petitioner was arrested on the spot and his name has been figured only on the basis of

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43544 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/2

¶18

disclosure made by local villagers, he has got clean antecedent as stated in para-3 of the petition and he is in custody since 06.05.2026.

¶19

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶20

In view of the aforesaid submissions as made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 852 of 2022.

¶21

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

Jae Paswan @ Jay Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jae Paswan @ Jay Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kavindra Singh @ Kamendra Singh Vs Sanjay Kumar

Bhola Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Bhim Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Saiyad Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeet Singh Vs The State of Bihar