Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44506 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2025 Thana- SACHIVALAYA District- Patna

======================================================

Ranjeet Kumar S/o Late Umesh Rai Resident of Gautam Nagar, Janta Road, Near Navrangi School, P.O. and P.S.- Gardanibagh, Distt.- Patna, Bihar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Roushan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 08-07-2026

¶10

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶12

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of four cases under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 82.89 litres of liquor from three vehicles.

¶13

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of one of the seized vehicles, i.e., scooty. It is next submitted that no prudent

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44506 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 2/3

¶15

person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that Anshu would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged, who was also apprehended from the spot along with four other named accused.

¶16

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶17

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sachiwalaya P.S. Case No. 246 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶18

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than four cases then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44506 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026 3/3

¶20

Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of four cases in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶21

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶22

Sumit/-

¶23

U T

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Solu Kumar @ Sonu Yadav @ Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar Burnwal Vs The State of Bihar

Chhatri Yadav @ Kshatriya Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sohan Prasad @ Sohan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar