Prahlad Saw Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42923 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2021 Thana- MALI District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Prahlad Saw S/o Late Lakhan Saw Resident of Village- Nalband Toli, P.S.Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Mukul Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KUMAR MANISH ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 22-07-2026

¶9

Heard Mrs. Mukul Kumari, learned counsel for the

¶10

petitioner and Mrs. Renu Kumari, learned APP for the State.

¶11

The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Session Trial No. 5190/2022, CIS No. 517/2021, arising out of Mali P.S. Case No. 35 of 2021, for the offences punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.

¶12

Earlier, the petitioner has approached before this Hon’ble Court for grant of anticipatory bail which was rejected vide order dated 19.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14042 of 2025.

¶13

As per the prosecution case, on a secret information, intercepted a Pick-up-van and on search total 1852 litres of country made liquor was recovered.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42923 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/3

¶16

petitioner was neither apprehended at the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. However, the petitioner only being the owner of the Pick-up-van has been implicated in this case. Petitioner next submits that the car in question is run by the driver and the petitioner was not even aware as to what was being carried by the driver. Petitioner next submits that there is one criminal antecedent of similar nature pending against the petitioner and in that case, the petitioner is on bail and in the present case, petitioner is in custody since 12.05.2026.

¶17

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

¶18

Since the matter is of year 2021 and the petitioner surrendered in this case after four years despite the fact that the petitioner being the owner of the pick-up-van in question.

¶19

This Court is inclined to grant liberty to the petitioner to move a regular bail application before the learned court below after completion of three months of custody. The learned court below shall consider the bail application of the petitioner and shall release the petitioner on bail after verification of the 3 months of custody upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below subject to the

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42923 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 3/3

¶21

condition:-

¶22

(i) One of the bailors should be family member of the

¶23

petitioner.

¶24

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in the trial and will remain present on all dates personally or should be duly represented through his counsel and whenever required to be physically present by the court, he should physically appear in the Court on that date.

¶25

(iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶26

(iv) The court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner/petitioners and if at any stage, it is found that the petitioner/petitioners has concealed his/their criminal antecedent, the Court below shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

¶27

With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application is disposed of.

¶28

(Kumar Manish, J)

¶29

Ranjeet/- U T

Prahlad Saw v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prahlad Saw v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Binod Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotan Shukla @ Ghotan Shukla @ Nilesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar