Badri Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 30-06-2026

¶11

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273, 414 and 34 of the IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶13

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 243 litres of liquor from two motorcycles.

¶14

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of one of the seized motorcycles. It is next submitted that no prudent person

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41721 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/3

¶16

would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that his friend would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged.

¶17

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶18

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 27 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶19

7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41721 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 3/3

¶21

person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

¶22

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶23

Sumit/-

¶24

U T

Badri Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badri Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Singh @ Manish Kumar @ Sonam Jee @ Sanam Jee Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Singh @ Dharmendra Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Subodh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar Yadav@ Balendra Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bhola Singh @ Ajay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar