Harun Rashid @ Mohammad Harun Rasid v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal miscellaneous appeal regarding an N.D.P.S. case, the High Court rejected the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail. The court held that the prima facie evidence of culpable mental state precluded the grant of relief, despite the petitioner's claim of false implication.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41237 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2026 Thana- NAKARDEI District- East Champaran
======================================================
Harun Rashid @ Mohammad Harun Rasid S/o- Nurain Miyaan @ Nurain Hussain R/v- Sirisiyawa Mal W.No-2, Ps- Nakardei Po- Noniyadih Dist- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mohd Rustam Hussain, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs.Asha Devi, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER
2 29-06-2026
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner who has been named in the FIR along with a recovered quantity of psychotropic substances.
Whether the search conducted under section 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act was followed in its true spirit in implicating the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Harun Rashid @ Mohammad Harun Rasid
Coram
Chandra Shekhar Jha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court