Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Nut @ Kundan Nut Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33369 of 2026

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-525 Year-2023 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran

======================================================

Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Nut @ Kundan Nut S/o Dudhnath Nut @ Dudhnath Nut R/o vill - Bazid Bhoraha/ Bajitbhoraha, P.S.- Madhaurah, Distt.- Saran at Chapra

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr.Rabindra Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 29-06-2026

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and apprehending his arrest in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case No.525 of 2023 registered under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶14

Allegation against the petitioner is to engage in illegal trade/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where there is total recovery of 16 litres IMFL/country-made liquor from the petitioner and other, namely, Dinesh Kumar.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the name of this petitioner arrayed solely

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33369 of 2026(3) dt.29-06-2026 2/3

¶17

for the reason that the petitioner is the owner of motorcycle bearing Registration No. BR04AM- 5104,which was involved in carrying illicit liquor. It is also submitted that the petitioner was neither present at the place of occurrence nor the petitioner is in any way connected with the alleged liquor. It is further argued that the bike of petitioner was given to his neighbour for doing some personal work. It is also submitted that recovery of illicit liquor was not made from conscious possession of this petitioner. Explaining criminal antecedent, it is submitted that the petitioner found involved in 7 more criminal cases, where he is on bail.

¶18

Learned APP opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶19

In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by taking note of the fact as recovery of illicit liquor prima facie not appears to be made from physical possession of this petitioner, accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33369 of 2026(3) dt.29-06-2026 3/3

¶21

Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court of Spl. (Special) Judge Excise-02, “Saran at Chapra, in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case No.525 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC/under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

¶22

(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

¶23

aniket/-

¶24

U T

Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Nut @ Kundan Nut v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kundan Kumar @ Kundan Kumar Nut @ Kundan Nut v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pappu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhinav Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Mumtaj @ Md. Mumtaz Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Harun Rashid @ Mohammad Harun Rasid Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Dharam Raj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar