Pappu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jun 2026CR. MISC./40336/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No. 40336 of 2026, decided 24-06-2026, Ashok Kumar Pandey, J. Bail application of Pappu Yadav v. The State of Bihar in Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 66 of 2026 (Sections 126(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) B.N.S. 2023; Section 27 Arms Act) allowed; bail bond Rs. 10,000 with two like sureties before CJM Patna; custody since 10.03.2026; two criminal antecedents noted; no injury to informant.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 66 of 2026. ¶¶20

Pappu Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40336 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2026 Thana- ATHMALGOLA District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pappu Yadav Son of Lutan Yadav Resident of Village- Gosain Gaon, P.S.Ghoswari, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Aishwarya Shankar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 24-06-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 66 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶15

The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner, along with others, has made firing, but none of the fire has hit the informant, rather, the same has hit in the shop of the informant.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the nature of allegation is general and

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40336 of 2026(2) dt.24-06-2026 2/2

¶18

omnibus and the informant has not received any kind of injury. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.03.2026.

¶19

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of two cases.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 66 of 2026.

¶21

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶22

Sudhanshu/-

Pappu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitu Devi @ Nitu Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Hariom Yadav @ Hariom Kumar Yadav @ Hariom Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Azad Sai @ Azad @ Azad Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Nirbhay Kumar @ Nirbhay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar