Allowed¶23

Parma Ray @ Parma Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jun 2026CR. MISC./38655/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; pre-arrest bail; road rage FIR; assault on victim; counter case; no criminal antecedent; Sonpur P.S. Case No. 94 of 2026; Sonepur; Saran; Bihar; BNS Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 113(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5); Section 438(2) CrPC 1973; Section 482 BNSS; bail bond Rs. 10,000; two sureties; four weeks to surrender; Justice Sandeep Kumar; 17-06-2026; Patna High Court; CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38655 of 2026.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail direction: petitioners to be released on bail if arrested or surrendered before the concerned Court below within four weeks, on bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC 1973 / Section 482 BNSS. ¶23

Parma Ray @ Parma Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38655 of 2026

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2026 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Parma Ray @ Parma Rai S/O Late Mahesh Rai R/o Vill- Murathan, P.SSonpur, Dist- Saran at Chapra, Bihar

¶5

Vishal Yadav @ Vishal Kumar S/o Parma Ray @ Parma Rai R/o VillMurathan, P.S- Sonpur, Dist- Saran at Chapra, Bihar

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar patna

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rakesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 17-06-2026

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 94 of 2026 registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 113(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are accused of assaulted the victim.

¶16

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is counter case also and the petitioner side has also

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38655 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026 2/2

¶18

received injuries. He further submits that the petitioners has no criminal antecedent.

¶19

From the reading of the FIR, it appears to be a

¶20

case of road rage.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts, this application

¶22

is allowed.

¶23

Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court below in connection with Sonpur P.S. Case No. 94 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.

¶24

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶25

Vikas/-

¶26

Parma Ray @ Parma Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parma Ray @ Parma Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhumal Kumar Singh @ Dhuman Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Poshan Yadav @ Poshan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kavita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Azmal Ansari @ Azmal Husain Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Nirala Vs The State of Bihar

Anish Kumar @ Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar